Was JFK 1st victim of New World Order?

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Was JFK 1st victim of New World Order? Kennedy possibly target of those seeking change in geopolitics NEW YORK – Was John F. Kennedy assassinated as the first presidential victim of the emerging "New World Order" championed by former CIA directors Allen Dulles and George H. W. Bush? Armed with recently declassified documents, New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi tackles that question in "Who Really Killed Kennedy" as the 50th anniversary of the assassination approaches. Corsi points out Kennedy had refused to authorize the Navy to launch a military strike from an aircraft carrier to save the faltering U.S.-backed invasion of Cuba known as the Bay of Pigs attack. Kennedy also refused to authorize the use of U.S. military force in Laos and, just before he was assassinated, he had decided to pull out of Vietnam. Secret details of JFK's assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of "Who Really Killed Kennedy?" by Jerome Corsi now! Hot war in Vietnam On Sept. 2, 1963, Labor Day, at Hyannisport, Mass., JFK had a relaxed interview outdoors with CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite, who that sunny day was inaugurating a new television news program. About midway into the interview, Cronkite asked about Vietnam: "Mr. President, the only hot war we've got running at the moment is of course the one in Vietnam, and we have our difficulties there, quite obviously." Kennedy answered directly, careful to set the stage for explaining why a military withdrawal from Vietnam was beginning to make sense to him. "I don't think that unless a greater effort is made by the government [of South Vietnam] to win popular support that the war can be won out there," Kennedy explained. "In the final analysis, it is their war. They are the ones who have to win it or lose it. We can't help them, we can give them equipment, we can send our men out there as advisers, but they have to win it, the people of Vietnam, against the communists." In the interview, notes Corsi, Kennedy distanced himself from saying the U.S. should withdraw from Vietnam, insisting it would "be a great mistake." Corsi says Kennedy properly worried that no direct U.S. military intervention in a region like Southeast Asia could succeed, regardless of how many troops were sent or what type of arms were provided, unless the indigenous population was ready to fight and die for their own freedom. JFK also worried, Corsi writes, that the type of corrupt regimes common in countries such as Laos and Vietnam almost certainly promised defeat, since any victories won on the battlefield would be compromised as corrupt elites in power oppressed the very people they were claiming to save from communism. By offering military assistance, the president believed he could test the resolve and the ability of a nation such as Vietnam to win in a war against indigenous communists supported by China and Russia with a wide range of financial assistance, military training and sophisticated military equipment. That policy, to withdraw the bulk of U.S. military personnel from Vietnam by the end of 1965, became official government policy on Oct. 11, 1963, when Kennedy signed National Security Action Memorandum No. 263. The goal was to have the Defense Department announce the withdrawal of 1,000 military advisers from Vietnam by the end of 1963. Secret details of JFK's assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of "Who Really Killed Kennedy?" by Jerome Corsi now! The speech JFK never gave On Nov. 22, 1963, the day he was assassinated, JFK was on his way to the Dallas Trade Center to give a luncheon address. This, the "Unspoken Speech," contained a strong and clear statement of Kennedy's determination to support U.S. allies and to fight back communism worldwide through a military and economic assistance program, not through the direct intervention of military forces. "But American military might should not and need not stand alone against the ambitions of international communism," JFK's prepared remarks read. "Our security and strength, in the last analysis, directly depend on the security and strength of others, and that is why our military and economic assistance plays such a key role in enabling those who live on the periphery of the communist world to maintain their independence of choice." The day he died in Dallas, Kennedy had intended to deliver a clear policy preference for providing military aid to nations such as Vietnam, rather than the alternative of committing U.S. military forces directly to the conflict. Beginning with the first days of his administration, when confronted with Laos, to the last hours of his administration, concerning Vietnam, JFK was under constant pressure from the military to ramp up U.S. military presence in Southeast Asia. White House historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr., on page 338 of his 1965 book "A Thousand Days," observed that starting with Laos, "the military left a predominant impression that they did not want ground troops at all unless they could send at least 140,000 men equipped with tactical nuclear weapons." The Pentagon was unrelenting in its position, calling for the possibility even of nuclear bombing of Hanoi and Beijing. Kennedy was moving in a different direction, Cori writes. Secret details of JFK's assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of "Who Really Killed Kennedy?" by Jerome Corsi now! The New World Order In the final analysis, Corsi asserts, JFK was killed because he saw U.S. military action in shades of gray, whereas New World Order warriors such as the Dulles brothers, George H. W. Bush, and Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon saw only black and white. Since the time Dulles headed the CIA in the 1950s, the CIA shared a belief with LBJ, Nixon and the military-industrial complex that even if U.S. military action failed in Cuba or in Laos and Vietnam, as it had in Korea, the military intervention would be good for business and the U.S. economy, according to  Corsi. The New World Order view pursued as U.S. foreign policy by Allen Dulles as head of the CIA and his brother John Foster Dulles, as secretary of state under Eisenhower, envisioned employing U.S. military action to preserve U.S. business interests, whether or not the wars were truly in U.S. national security interests. George H. W. Bush did not blink to engage in the Gulf War, fully realizing U.S. oil interests in Kuwait were being preserved. This was in sharp contrast to JFK. Under the ideologies of nationalism and self-determination that Kennedy used to analyze Cuba, Laos and Vietnam, it was clear JFK believed U.S. military involvement was ill-advised in each conflict, Corsi writes. Kennedy cared about U.S. business interests, but not necessarily to the point of going to war in a conflict that was basically a civil war, incidental to U.S. national security interests, he says. Had JFK lived, according to Corsi, the communist insurgency in Vietnam and the takeover of South Vietnam by North Vietnam would have been relegated to a footnote, the answer to an obscure question on a high school history test. As it happened, there are over 58,200 names carved into black granite walls of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. Both Presidents Johnson and Nixon made the Vietnam War a centerpiece of their presidential administrations, says Corsi. In retrospect, he contends, JFK was correct; the Vietnam War was not a war the U.S. could win, if fought the way the military-industrial complex wanted the conflict to be fought. The classic declaration of a "New World Order" is properly attributed to President George H. W. Bush. On Aug. 2, 1990, some 100,000 Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait, starting what became known as the Gulf War. On Sept. 11, 1990 – the original 9/11 of the George H. W. Bush presidency – Bush addressed a joint session of Congress, proclaiming "a big idea" he characterized as the "New World Order." In the speech's key passage, Bush said: We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge: a new era – freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come. What George H. W. Bush made clear with his "New World Order" speech to Congress on Sept. 11, 1990, was that the use of U.S. military power to protect U.S. business interests was especially justified when backed by an international coalition. Today, WND reports that critics charge President Obama's intention to launch a pre-emptive military strike on Syria has been motivated by New World Order instructions from Saudi Arabia, whose Sunni regime wants to eliminate the government of Bashar al-Assad in Syria to weaken its Shiite arch-enemies in Iran. That JFK would have gone to war to protect Kuwait's petroleum interests in 1991 or Saudi Arabia's petroleum interests today in Syria is a stretch to argue, especially when JFK backed off using U.S. military power to defeat communism in Cuba, Laos and Vietnam, despite the urging of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that intervention in these conflicts was vital to U.S. national security. Secret details of JFK's assassination are finally unlocked. Get your autographed copy of "Who Really Killed Kennedy?" by Jerome Corsi now! Cronyism, corruption, cover-ups cited as 'Impeachable Offenses' A brand-new book lays out the blueprint for impeaching President Barack Obama, alleging high crimes, misdemeanors, bribery and other offenses committed against the U.S. Constitution and the limitations on the executive office. "Impeachable Offenses: The Case for Removing Barack Obama from Office," by New York Times bestselling authors Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott, is slated for release Aug. 27. Already, the Daily Mail of London has called the work "explosive," reporting the book contains a "systematic connect-the-dots exercise that the president's defenders will find troublesome." "Consider this work to be the articles of impeachment against Barack Obama," stated Klein. Free bumper sticker with every purchase of "Impeachable Offenses" today! "Every American, whether conservative or liberal, Democrat, Republican or independent, should be concerned about the nearly limitless seizure of power, the abuses of authority, the cronyism, corruption, lies and cover-ups documented in this news-making book," Klein said. "Impeachable Offenses" promises to be the biggest summer blockbuster, presenting an indictment that goes well beyond today's headlines. Order it today at WND's Superstore. The authors stress the book is not a collection of generalized gripes concerning Obama and his administration. Rather, it is a well-documented indictment based on major alleged violations. Among the offenses enumerated in the book: •  Obamacare not only is unconstitutional but illegally bypasses Congress, infringes on states' rights and marking an unprecedented and unauthorized expansion of IRS power. •  Sidestepping Congress, Obama already has granted largely unreported de facto amnesty to millions of illegal aliens using illicit interagency directives and executive orders. •  The Obama administration recklessly endangered the public by releasing from prison criminal illegal aliens at a rate far beyond what is publicly known. •  The president's personal role in the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attack, with new evidence regarding what was transpiring at the U.S. mission prior to the assault – arguably impeachable activities in and of themselves. •  Illicit edicts on gun control in addition to the deadly "Fast and Furious" gun-running operation intended, the book shows, to collect fraudulent gun data. •  From "fusion centers" to data mining to drones to alarming Department of Homeland Security power grabs, how U.S. citizens are fast arriving at the stage of living under a virtual surveillance regime. •  New evidence of rank corruption, cronyism and impeachable offenses related to Obama's first-term "green" funding adventures. •  The illegality of leading a U.S.-NATO military campaign without congressional approval. •  Obama has weakened America both domestically and abroad by emboldening enemies, tacitly supporting a Muslim Brotherhood revolution, spurning allies and minimizing the threat of Islamic fundamentalism. Already, the White House is hitting back, calling the book's impeachment effort "foolhardy." Click here to view the soon-to-be-released blockbuster! "If the Republicans in the House want to try something that foolhardy, it will probably be run by the same group of lawmakers who have voted more than 40 times to repeal the Affordable Care Act," an unnamed administration official told the Daily Mail. "Like most of the partisan actions coming out of the House, the Senate would never stoop to dignify it," the official added. Klein and Elliott acknowledge that impeachment of a sitting president "is certainly a matter of the utmost gravity, and not a charge to be undertaken for what our Founding Fathers would have called mere 'factional' advantage." "We will show how Obama has not hesitated to go beyond democratic, legal and constitutional means to advance his radical agenda," they write. Even before the release date of Aug. 27, the publisher is receiving huge advance orders from retailers. You can get your copy early – personally signed by both authors – through the WND Superstore right now. Don't wait. While every major bookstore in America is being shipped massive supplies, demand for this timely book is expected to be high. Read more about "Impeachable Offenses" today at WND's Superstore. New releases from WND Books: DISINFORMATION: FORMER SPY CHIEF REVEALS SECRET STRATEGIES FOR UNDERMINING FREEDOM, ATTACKING RELIGION AND PROMOTING TERRORISM The highest-ranking Soviet bloc intelligence official ever to defect to the West, Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa is at it again. A quarter century ago, in his international bestseller "Red Horizons," Pacepa exposed the massive crimes and corruption of his former boss, Romanian President Nicolae Ceauşescu, giving the dictator a nervous breakdown and inspiring him to send assassination squads to the U.S. to find his former spy chief and kill him. They failed. On Christmas Day 1989, Ceauşescu was executed by his own people at the end of a trial wherein accusations came almost word for word out of "Red Horizons." BLACK YELLOWDOGS (AUTOGRAPHED) Buy "Black Yellowdogs (Autographed) (Paperback)" exclusively at the WND Superstore before its scheduled release September 10, 2013. The most dangerous citizen is not armed but uninformed. It has often been said, "What you don't know won't hurt you." Not true. Ignorance is deadly. Have you ever heard the phrase, "Forty acres and a mule"? Do you know how slavery actually began in America? Did you know the KKK lynched over a thousand white people? Do you know why? Have you ever wondered what African-Americans want, and why they vote Democratic? Did you know that most blacks DO NOT support Affirmative Action? Who speaks for African-Americans? Do Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and others really speak for black America? Who elected these "civil rights leaders"? If you have ever considered, even briefly, any one of these questions, or others in the area of race relations, then you need your own copy of "Black Yellowdogs." (What does "black yellowdogs" mean, anyway?) View all WND Books. What Went Wrong?: The Inside Story of the GOP Debacle of 2012 . . . And How It Can Be Avoided Next Time (Autographed) Be the first to receive "What Went Wrong?: The Inside Story of the GOP" (Autographed) before its scheduled release on July 23, 2013. By New York Times bestselling author, Jerome Corsi. It was a race of certainty on both sides. Even on Election Day, Mitt Romney's campaign advisers were convinced Romney would be elected president, while Barack Obama's team was equally resolute he would reclaim the White House. How was the Republican Party so misguided? Where did the party go wrong? Although the results were far from preordained, the carefully crafted strategy of the well-oiled and underestimated Democratic Party machine left Romney's team sitting in a heap of disastrous miscalculations and America with four more years of Obama at 1600 Pennsylvania. For conservatives nationwide, the outcome of the 2012 presidential election was a harsh wake-up call: Superior policy can't surpass superior movement in a campaign. View all WND Books here.     Call Toll-Free to Order:  If you prefer to order by phone, you can call our friendly, Midwestern customer service reps toll-free at 1-800-4WND-COM  (1-800-496-3266), Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm Central.   If you are unable to see images in the message above, click here. This email was sent to buzzhairs@gmail.com as a subscriber to the Offers from WNDsuperstore.com e-mail list or past customer. To change your e-mail delivery preferences or unsubscribe, please click here If you are interested in advertising with WND.com, the leading independent news source on the Net, e-mail advertising@wnd.com WND | 2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351 | Washington, DC 20006 Copyright 1997-2013 WND.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.